Jacket 17 — June 2002 | # 17 Contents | Homepage | Catalog | |
Back to the Ern Malley Contents page (The Melbourne) Age, 4 November 1944and a subsequent comment by 'F.S'. |
|
|
READERS who were unable to secure copies of the now notorious “Ern Malley” number of “Angry Penguins” may be glad to have a reprint of the Malley Poems, issued as “The Darkening Ecliptic,” by Messrs. Reed and Harris (Melbourne). It is a literary curiosity, for the celebrated hoax and the subsequent lawsuit have made these poems the most discussed event in Australian literary history. The discussion is by no means finished yet. It will probably go on for years as new facts become known and new judgments are made. |
Even now, at this short distance from the event, one gets a curious impression from reading these poems. It is quite impossible to overlook their very considerable merit. They are good stuff for those who like the modern manner. Whatever the deficiencies of Mr. Max Harris as critic and poet, it is very difficult, indeed, to feel that he erred in his estimate of these poems. That many who have not read them should doubt this is to be expected, and that those whose taste in literature was formed and fixed by what they were taught at School should mock is also to be expected. But with whatever doubts and hesitancies, honest criticism will endorse Mr. Harris’s judgment, and we will undoubtedly hear more of this matter. |
Comment by ‘F.S.’, the writer in The Bulletin’s ‘Red Page’, in an unidentified and undated clipping:
“F.S.”: Some time ago I suggested that the mana of “Ern Malley” might survive his exposure by his two creators. It looks as if my prophecy is coming to pass. A writer in a Melbourne daily’s literary supplement recently hinted that “Malley’s” stuff might have more in it than the writers consciously intended. “The ‘Durer’ poem,” he suggested, “despite an occasional lapse which criticism might cavil at, is a very fine effort, which would do credit to any anthology and to most poets.” Later he remarks: “Whatever the deficiencies of Max Harris as critic and poet, it is very difficult indeed to feel that he erred in his estimate of these poems.” It is more difficult to believe that two irreverent jokers who set out to write nonsense verses could have been inspired by the gods without knowing it. |
Jacket 17 — June 2002
Contents page This material is copyright © Jacket magazine 2002 |